🔗 Share this article

"A significant portion of my life is saved on Snapchat, and unexpectedly they want us to pay for it."

Negative ratings and a sense of unfairness have dominated social media conversations since the app emerged as the most recent tech firm to start charging for a function that people previously accessed for at no cost.

The company behind Snapchat revealed in September that it would start charging subscribers if they have exceeding five gigabytes worth of archived pictures and clips stored as the Memories feature.

For many, these old snaps serve as a window to the past – leading some to criticize the corporation of "corporate greed" in messages on online platforms and poor feedback on digital storefronts.

Other Choices

Snapchat's parent has compared its premium storage tiers to those offered by Apple and Google for mobile devices.

As another possibility for individuals avoiding fees, subscribers may save their archived media – which for certain users amount to tens of gigabytes – to their own hardware.

The firm stated that only a minority of users would be affected by the new policy.

They recognized that it was "never easy to transition from accessing content at no charge to paying for it" – but proposed it would be "worth the cost" for subscribers.

Many opposing the change via digital channels clearly oppose this view.

Widespread Discontent

A web-based protest called the charge a "memory tax", with participants calling it "bleak" and "outrageous" – while a user threatened to quit the app again.

At the same time, in a poor rating on the app marketplace, a individual calling themselves Natacha Jonsson said it felt "very unethical".

"As a member of that generation, the majority have a long history of memories on Snapchat," they wrote. "The vast majority only remained on the platform mainly for that feature. Five gigabytes is insufficient when you have years worth of recordings... Goodbye to the app."

Additionally, a journalism student, a 20-year-old aspiring reporter in the UK capital, shared on the video platform her decision to uninstall the application.

"I made up my mind that I had to save all my archived media as soon as I could," she explained. "The vast majority of my teenage years have been documented through my archived posts, all of the photos in there are deeply meaningful to me."

"The decision appears unreasonable to introduce fees individuals for a service that has been free for such a long time."

Uncertain Costs

Snapchat has not disclosed how much subscription tiers would cost in the UK – only that they are part of a "slow worldwide introduction".

Yet a young adult Amber Daley, who is based in London, commented in a upload on TikTok that she would be "devastated" by such charges.

She explained that the service had become "integrated into daily routine" since she began accessing it in the past.

While she said she accepted the platform needed to generate revenue, the user indicated that the saved content option holds greater significance than the firm may have anticipated.

"I think it's quite an unfair decision to charge your customers who have been loyal and devoted," she said. "These aren't just called Memories, these are our real-life recollections."

Industry Perspective

Firms deciding to charge from users for a service that was previously free is nothing new, and millions subscribe to services like cloud storage solutions to backup their media content from their handset.

The fact of storing data in the online servers – which certain experts in the tech industry like to refer to as essentially "an external server" – is that it costs money.

"Hosting trillions of archived media on the service requires significant resources," social media consultant an industry analyst explained. "The company has to try to find a method to offset the expenses of data retention, bandwidth, duplicates, file sharing, security measures – everything involved."

But Mr Navarra said that requiring payment for a function that had previously been free, and users had been encouraged to use as such, may seem like a "bait and switch" for many people.

"Altering the terms after users have created this massive online collection seems unfair," he said. And for many, he stated, "Memories aren't just data dumps, they're personal mementos."

The opinion was shared by those leaving critical reviews, with an individual calling their saved images and clips "deeply important to me".

"These archives contain every aspect of my experiences within them from joyful events like births, sad moments of loss, experiences shared with close ones, [and] my whole teenage years," they commented.

Expert Analysis

A postdoctoral researcher, a research fellow at an educational establishment in the the Low Countries, said that the platform's decision shows the consequences of business-oriented apps being used to archive meaningful individual recordings.

"Platforms gain from this reliance, mutual reliance, and expectation of continuous entry, which even incentivises certain individuals to stay on the service or keep accessing it in order to review their stored media," she told the media. "Yet these are not benevolent guardians of personal memory."