🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for companies – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Expensive

According to recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from both employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee making moderate income pays about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare that with what the typical American pays. I can name multiple clients that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When including those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like many our government's military, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would render administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – as opposed to the current system which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and less expensive approach for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.